Western Civilization Essays - Nazism, Free Essays, Term Papers

Western Civilization Essays - Nazism, Free Essays, Term Papers Western Civilization Western Civilization Final Exam Tuesday, June 23, 1998 Question: What were the causes of the World War II? Do you believe that the war could have been prevented? Why or Why not? After the fall of the Weimar government, and the rise to power of the National Socialists headed by Adolph Hitler, Germany underwent huge transformations. One of the largest of these was the change in foreign policy. Between the years of 1933 and 1936, while the Nazis began to consolidate their power, Hitlers foreign policy was one of appeasement. Germany did what ever it could to keep peace and tensions low between itself and Great Britain, Italy and the USSR. Germany used this appeasement to keep peace long enough to fully gain control of the country. After 1936, their policy changed. Nazi Germanys foreign policy towards Great Britain was do what ever it takes to keep them happy. Germany wasnt ready to have them as an enemy yet. Hitler felt that the longer he had to prepare for war the better. One of the friendly agreements was the allowing of the British rearmament by Germany. This was the first time that Germany tried to drive a wedge between France and Great Britain. Hitler offered to concede substantial rearmament to Great Britain, while also subtly hinting to both Italy and Great Britain to combine forces against France. Great Britain did not take up Hitlers proposals, but he did not abandon his efforts. In 1934, Germany formally began to talk with Great Britain, and they agreed on the Naval Accords in May. These accords were a smart move by Hitler, because he gained power for Germany while, at the same time, making Great Britain feel more powerful. What the Navel Accords did was set up the amounts of which each country could have a navy. At that time, the British navy was by far the strongest, having twice the amount of its nearest competitor, France. The British fleet controlled the Mediterranean, and Hitler was jealous of this incredible power. Hitler agree in May that the German naval fleet would only build up to 35% of the British fleet. To Britain, this seem like a confession of inferiority, because Germany was admitting to be only 35% of Great Britain. But to Germany, this was a way to rearm themselves to the point of where they were only slightly behind their enemies, the French. Hitler knew that German forces could defeat the French on land, but by sea, they needed to build. But to build a strong navy would anger the British. However, Hitler found a way to do both. The discussions between Germany and Great Britain continue in 1935. In March, Hitler and Von Ribbentrop met with Simon and Eden from Great Britain. At first, Britain wanted desperately to tie down the Germans by having them become a member of the League of Nations. The British wanted any German aggression in the future to be punishable by international law. This way, it would be the worlds problem if the Germans attached France, not just Great Britains and Frances, like in World War I. It was obviously not in Hitler or Germanys best interests to join the League of Nations, but again Germany felt much more freedom in bilateral agreements, ones which only involve two countries. Instead of rejecting the invitation, Germany using very clever diplomatic technique, replied by offering one such bilateral agreement, in which Germany would gain colonial power, along with a sphere of preservation. They also used negotiating power to postpone all binding treaties. While the provisions of the ag reement were never fully carried out it is important to understand that Germany, was not subservient to Great Britain, certainly attempted to reduce tensions, even to the point of an alliance against France. By 1936, Hitler had successfully brought Germany closer to Great Britain using many valuable diplomatic techniques. Great Britian was not the only country to be appeased by Nazi Germany. Italy, too, was an important link in Nazi foreign policy. Hitler knew that Germany could not survive another two and possibly three front war. Hitler was forced to give up one or more of these borders, and gain an alley as well. He chose Italy. Italy had

Existentialism in Mersault Essays

Existentialism in Mersault Essays Existentialism in Mersault Essay Existentialism in Mersault Essay Albert Camus was a Gallic author who is besides a existential philosophy philosopher. He contributes to the development of the doctrine of existential philosophy. although he refused to be associated with any political orientation. His philosophical ideas contained in his Hagiographas. Camus delivers it by making fictional characters and dramatic events. non merely in the signifier of idea and analysis. The thought of absurdness. or things contrary to the common position. and his paradoxically ideas contained in his plant which one them is seen in his work this fresh entitle The Outsider. Meursault as the chief character in the novel is described as a adult male who make the sense of his life in his ain position. He felt that the life he lived is normal although people around him think that he is different. This is seen when she was confronted by the intelligence of his mother’s decease. He was merely reacting to it as a natural that every homo being in the universe must be both sing life and decease subsequently on. today. tomorrow. or whenever it was. In the funeral. he shows the attitude indifferent as non desiring to see his mother’s cadaver. call to her. or shows a deep heartache to the attenders. Because he said. he had no ground to be sad or mourn his female parent. because one time once more he considers this is a natural. This is seen in the quotation mark below. Mother died today. Or possibly yesterday. I don’t know. I had a wire from the place: Mother passed off. Funeral tomorrow. Yours unfeignedly. ’ That doesn’t mean anything. It may hold been yesterday. Camus ( 1982: 3 ) Not merely on her mother’s funeral. he is apathetic. but besides to populate a life he is really level and unemotional. However. behind it there is the nature of honestness in him. This is apparent because in every action and word he merely stating what is on his head without overstating or stating unneeded. Equally good as Marie. her girlfriend asks him to get married her. she merely state yes. but when he asked once more he replied that it was non of import. and if Marie wants him to get married her he would get married her. She so wanted to cognize if I loved her. I replied as I had done one time already. that it didn’t average anything but that I likely didn’t. Why get married me so? ’ she said. I explained to her that it truly didn’t affair and that if she wanted to. we could acquire married. Anyhow. she was the 1 who was inquiring me and I was merely stating yes. Camus ( 1982: 39 ) For Meursault he lives in this universe with his ain will without holding to believe or follow the regulations set in the environment. He lived his life like what he wants without holding to repent. As he revealed about a his offense that killing an Arab. While in prison he refused to engage a attorney to assist him decide the instance. but he eventually agreed to utilize a attorney who has been appointed by the prison governments. He does this because he thinks he does non necessitate defence from other people on what he has done. The attorney had been made upset by Mersault because Meursault does non desire to asseverate a defence or seek to supply grounds to relieve his offense. As an account of the existential philosophy humanitarianism earlier. that no regulator or legislator but himself. Consequently himself that he must make up ones mind for himself anyhow by looking outside itself a end of self-liberation to this adult male can Recognize himself as genuinely human. In the fresh Meursault refuses anyone regulating what he should make and assumptions that he are incorrect. He said no 1 or anything else that can be a regulator or legislator could act upon it. He merely lived his life harmonizing to his ain positions in giving significance in his life and he neer regretted anything he has done even though he himself did non believe that what he did was the right thing. This can be seen in the undermentioned citation. Of class. I couldn’t assist acknowledging that he was right. I didn’t much repent what I’d done. Bus I was surprised that he was so ferocious about it. I’d have like to hold explained to him in a friendly manner. about dearly. that I’d neer truly been able to repent anything. Camus ( 1982: 93 ) He determined by the decease sentence by a justice because of his indifferent of her mother’s decease. The justice explain that a few yearss subsequently he alternatively has a day of the month with Marie and watch a amusing film with her. befriends and involves in his neighbour named Raymond retaliation to Raymond’s kept woman. and goes on a beach holiday with both. Meursault passes tragic life as if nil has happened. While his waiting to the twenty-four hours of his decease sentence we can see what the true kernel of life in Meursault’s position. in the fury of his idea in prison. It does non intend that he is non afraid of decease. but he deals it with his ain. Several times he refused to run into with the chaplain. because he thought it merely wastes his clip that merely few remains to speak about things that are non meant for him. Meursault is told in this novel as one who does non believe in God or godlessness. Harmonizing to him. how he lived or what the intent of life is determined by himself without the engagement from other people. It seen in quotation mark below. From the deepnesss of my hereafter. throughout the whole of this absurd life I’d been taking. I’d felt a obscure breath drifting towards me across all old ages that were still to come. and on its manner this breath had evened out everything that was so being proposed to me in the every bit unreal old ages I was populating through. Camus ( 1982: 111 ) As if this great effusion of choler had purged all my ailments. killed all my hopes. I looked up the mass of marks and stars in the sky and laid myself unfastened for the first clip to benign indifference of the universe. And happening it so much like myself. in fact so fraternal. I realized that I’d been happy. and that I was still happy. For the concluding consummation and for me to experience less entirely. my last want was that there should be a crowd of witnesss at my executing and that they should recognize me with calls of hatred. Camus ( 1982: 113 ) The 2nd quotation mark is the last paragraph in this novel that tells the last clip before his executing. In those sentences. that Meursault reveals is apparent that he feels happy when he faces decease. He thinks that the universe is non concerned with human jobs and it has likewise with him who was apathetic to the human jobs that are non related to him. Therefore. he thought that after his decease. he will unify with the universe and he will non experience lonely. Meursault besides said that his life would be more meaningful if his decease was witnessed by people who raining him with cried of hatred than if he dies in purdah. He thinks this will be memorized by the people who have witnessed the decease. Decision From the account of analysis above it can be conclude that Mersault as the chief character of the novel The Outsider is existentialist. It depicted by the writer. Albert Camus through Mersault’s says. Acts of the Apostless. and ideas. which describe that Mersault lives his unrecorded with his ain manner and his ain position. He argues that in the universe there is no 1 or individual thing that can be regulator or legislator. which can act upon his life. It is merely himself who knows what he should make an how he lives his life in this universe. Lives the life in the universe is the basic of basic construction of human being. The concurrence in the words shows that being of homo can non get away from his universe. Impossible that adult male released from his universe and. otherwise. the universe may non be released from homo who constructed it. There is besides no two experiences are indistinguishable. Therefore. being is a in private owned. that being is non replaceable by anyone. It clearly described in Mersault’s character who is apathetic to the other things that in his sentiment those things are does non intend anything to him.

An analysis of the movie Somewhere between Essay

An analysis of the movie Somewhere between - Essay Example An analysis of the movie "Somewhere between" Jenni is 14 years old and she lives in Berkeley California. She was adopted at age five she speaks mandarin she knows she’s a stranger to either country. Jenna cook is 15 years old lives in Massachusetts, Newburyport. She is an over achiever and a top student at an academy in New Hampshire. Butler is 13 years old, she lives in Tennessee Nashville and she has the ambition to be the first Chinese person to play in the grand ‘ole opry’. Ann Boccuti is 14 years of age and she lives in Pennsylvania, Lansdale. The girls are highly articulate, personable and self-aware as they know they belong to two adversely different cultures. The young women allow the viewers to grasp the experience of coming of age in America as trans-racial adoptees. Through these young women experiences and their exploration the viewers are able to consider themselves as individuals and as a nation of immigrant. The films structure weaves back and forth between the girls individual threads making it hard for the viewers to distinct and separate their narratives. The characters also had confusing names, Jenni and Jenna this gives the audience a hard time to follow and distinguish the two characters. It would have helped if the director had established the individual girls more firmly before moving back and forth in their threads.The directors should ensure that the lighting is sufficient to reveal the characters’ faces. This makes the movie more real and revealing.